筆記-法官說了算，缺席的證據與邏輯

償還書債&打消讀書爛尾ing
http://www.books.com.tw/products/0010573479

作者的blog

http://hannahtien.blogspot.tw/

 

書本最上面的格言是「沒有真相就不會有正義」
What If沒有人知道真相（事情的全貌），then我們該如何追求正義？

裏面提到很多法官會犯的邏輯誤謬，想到敝人做過的一些事故調查分析報告，好像也犯了很多邏輯誤謬和自以為是的自圓其說，罪過，罪過…TAT

 

想想工作與人生

想想工作

幾個自我工作認知的疆界與層次

 

生產與作業管理角度的工安議題

從production and operation management相關期刊，所刊登出的工安議題文章，
找了三份重點期刊上的四篇文章，窺探其想法與觀點

 

Is Safe Production an Oxymoron?

作者

Mark Pagell, David Johnston, Anthony Veltri, Robert Klassen, Markus Biehl

出處：

Production and Operations Management 0(0), pp. 1–15, © 2013 Production and Operations Management Society

 

Introduction

Much of this research concludes that the practices operational managers engage in to improve operational performance put workers at increased risk (e.g., Brenner et al. 2004, Ford and Tetrick 2008, Landsbergis et al. 1999, Lewchuck et al. 2001, Parker 2003, Pate-Cornell and Murphy 1996, Zohar 2002, Zohar and Luria 2005).
提高產出與生產效率，難免增加員工作業風險

Safety regulation is being created based on research conducted in operational settings that ignores operational outcomes. However, today safety regulators are still making decisions based on research conducted in operational settings that treats safety as somehow separate from other operational outcomes.

安全法規的制定只考慮作業危害，不考慮作業的效率(便利)與產出；也錯誤地只看安全的部份(把工安視為獨立於生產作業機制體系之外的單獨議題)

 

想想高雄氣爆(8/28 updated)

除掉震驚與希望追查真相的鄉民直覺情緒反應，冷眼發想此一事件的長期演變

感覺掉飛機等重大黑天鵝事件其實背後的pattern與脈絡都是一樣的

文末附贈不夠嚴謹的case study聊供打滾同業參考